The rjtools package has implemented some automated
checks to assess if it appropriately follows the R Journal format. It is
important that authors read information at journal website.
This vignette will demonstrate these checks with an example article,
paper-with-errors,
where the argument path = path_to_article in the checks
points to the directory of the .tex file. If you have created the
article using create_article() with the default arguments,
you can check with path = here::here("rjarticle").
All the nine checks in rjtools can be completed with
initial_check_article(), given a path to the article
folder:
The check result will be saved in an initial_check.log file under the same folder, as well as displayed in the console. This is how it looks like for the sample article:
Initial check results:
ERROR: Submission does not have consistently named tex, bib, and R files
SUCCESS: No problematic file found
SUCCESS: Possible motivation letter found
ERROR: The title is not in title case! Suggest title to be changed to:
ToOoOlTiPs: An R Package for Customizable Tooltips in Interactive Graphics
SUCCESS: All sections are properly formatted in sentence case
SUCCESS: Abstract comes before the introduction section
NOTE: A potential list of spelling to check: tooltips, tooltip, alison, ggplotThe nine individual checks contained in
initial_check_article() are:
check_filenames()
check_unnecessary_files()
check_cover_letter()
check_title()
check_section()
check_spelling()
check_proposed_pkg()
check_packages_available()
and they can all be individually checked on the article.
The .bib file is named Rjreferences.bib when created and
we recommend setting a consistent name across the .bib, .tex, and .Rmd
file. A fix to this is to rename the
Rjreferences.bib as the file name you used when create the
article, in our case, paper-with-errors.
This function checks that the folder doesn’t contain the
RJtemplate.tex file, which is included the past R journal
template. The authors
instruction requires the authors to replace the content of this
RJtemplate.tex file with article content and name with the
lowercase concatenated author name, so it is essentially the
.tex file automatically generated in the previous section.
Our article don’t have unnecessary files.
Cover letter should be provided for all articles and saved at the
same folder as the article. The function checks whether there possible
motivation letters are in the main directory, and recommends to put them
in the motivation-letter folder if so. Our article passes
this check.
The article title needs to be in the title case and the check is not
happy with our title here. Use tools::toTitleCase() to get
the correct title case format:
tools::toTitleCase("ToOoOlTiPs: An R package for Customizable Tooltips in Interactive Graphics")
#> [1] "ToOoOlTiPs: An R Package for Customizable Tooltips in Interactive Graphics"Here we forget to capitalise “P” in the word “package” - better make
this change before submission! Also if the title contains the package
you’re proposing, i.e ToOoOlTiPs in our article, use the
\pkg{.} tag rather than \CRANpkg{.}.
Section titles need to be in the sentence case and we are all good here :)
The spelling is checked from the abstract to bibliography section and
only words with all lowercase letters are checked to avoid picking up on
acronyms and names. The underlying checking is done through the
hunspell package with US spelling by default. British
spelling can be checked with argument dic = "en_GB". The R
journal welcomes both the U.S and British spelling, along with other
national variation, as long as consistency is maintained.
Notice that the spelling check may pick up some domain specific vocabularies and authors may want to further confirm if these are true spelling mistakes. In our article, “tooltip” is a specialised vocabulary in interactive graphics, rather than a misspell, so we are free to go :)
The package proposed in an article should already be available on
CRAN before article submission. check_proposed_pkg()
prompts the following in the console:
What’s the name of package being proposed in the article? If none, please enter 0.
and authors need to enter the exact package name, with proper
capitalisation, for an availability check on CRAN download. For our
article, enter ToOoOlTiPs in the console and the check
would say
NOTE: No CRAN activities detected for package ToOoOlTiPs
Not surprising that CRAN can’t find our package since it is a hypothetical one!
All the packages mentioned with a \CRANpkg{.} or
\BIOpkg{.} tag need to be available on CRAN or Bioconductor
and check_packages_available() makes sure this is the case.
For our article, we get
! ERROR: 1 of 5 package(s) not available on CRAN: ToOoOlTiPs
which is not really an issue here!
Editors, associate editors and reviewers will routinely check that papers adhere to these criteria:
Advice on good coding style can be found in the rjtools
article “More
details on the R Journal format”.
ggplot2 to make your plots, the
citation for this package needs to be added to your paper. See more
details below if you need help on how ot do this.How to get the package citations
The preferred citation is provided by:
> citation("ggplot2")
To cite ggplot2 in publications, please use
H. Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis.
Springer-Verlag New York, 2016.
A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
@Book{,
author = {Hadley Wickham},
title = {ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag New York},
year = {2016},
isbn = {978-3-319-24277-4},
url = {https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org},
}To check if you’ve appropriately cited all the packages used in your
code, the grateful
package can help.
In the project where you are writing your paper, use
to get a .bib file for all packages referenced. The
entries can be added to the rest of your paper’s bib file.
The scan_packages function can give you a list of the
packages you are using.